This informal CPD article on Leading a Remote Team was provided by Ayming UK, who aim to improve Business Operational and Financial Performance.
As flexible and hybrid working models become the new norm in many businesses, more managers are having to get used to running remote teams.
In the pandemic, sending workers home was an emergency response – previously unthinkable for some managers and unimaginable to employees. In a crisis, there was a common commitment to make it work. Now, many people see the freedom to carry out some, or all, of their work remotely as a right. Managers must learn to deal with their own concerns and strike a more delicate balance between control and autonomy.
This capability is one of the skills typically shown by advanced leaders. They steadily increase the freedom given their teams, moving away from micro-management to focus more on delegation and motivation. The leader always retains authority and overall responsibility for the team’s output, but as trust grows, so does freedom.
Coming to terms with new ways of working
First, you must lay the groundwork. Set clear expectations of what you want from your team. You need to trust them, but set guidelines not just for work standards, but also interactions, such as which communication channels to use and acceptable responses times. Then focus on goals and outcomes – not the hours team members are clocking up. If they achieve what’s expected, it shouldn’t matter if they work to a slightly different pattern.
Flexibility is demanded of the manager in turn. The challenge is to switch between different leadership styles as appropriate, while ensuring that members always feel part of a team and you are its leader.
At times amid the uncertainty of the pandemic, managers may have had to show they were in control with a more autocratic, coercive style of decision-making. A team that has only recently made the transition to remote working may need to re-focus on your vision, so set this out with confidence and empathy to inspire change. When there’s a rift in the team, perhaps between workplace and home-based members, an affiliative people-centric approach will be better suited to restoring harmony.
Other ‘primal leadership’ styles (as classified by Daniel Goleman) are appropriate when a more cohesive remote team is settled and operating well. ‘Pacesetting’ involves challenging a highly motivated and competent team to produce quick results; while a coaching style is designed to develop people as part of a long-term strategy.